Current:Home > NewsWithout Social Security reform Americans in retirement may lose big, report says -FundWay
Without Social Security reform Americans in retirement may lose big, report says
View
Date:2025-04-18 07:28:49
How would you feel if you and your spouse lost $16,500 in income a year?
That's how much a typical dual-income couple is estimated to lose in Social Security benefits if they retire when the Social Security Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) trust fund is depleted in 2033, the nonprofit, nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB) said in a new report Thursday. A typical single-income couple would lose $12,400, it said.
Since Social Security is currently paying out more benefits than it's collecting in payroll tax and other revenue, the program is drawing down its reserves in the OASI trust fund to cover the remaining cost of benefits. The fund only has enough reserves to cover 100% of benefits until the fund's reserves are depleted in 2033. When that happens, the law limits benefits to incoming revenue, which essentially mandates a 21% across-the-board benefit cut for the program’s 70 million beneficiaries, CRFB said.
"Former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris have both said they would “protect” the Social Security program," CRFB said. "However, neither has put forward a plan to meaningfully do so."
Who will be the biggest losers?
Low-income, dual-income couples retiring in 2033 would lose $10,000 in benefits, compared with $21,800 for a high-income couple, CRFB said.
"Although the cut for a low-income couple would be smaller and reflect a 21% reduction in their benefits, the cut would be a larger share of their income," it noted.
Social Security benefits rollercoaster:2025 COLA estimate dips with inflation, but high daily expenses still burn seniors
It'll get worse over time, too
If the government doesn't reform the program, the gap between revenues and benefits paid out will continue to widen, CRFB said. The 21% cut across the board in 2033 will deepen to a 31% cut by 2098, it said.
If Trump also executes his plan to stop taxing Social Security without a plan to fully replace that revenue, the program would be further hamstrung, CRFB said.
Currently, only seniors who earn less than $25,000 per year ($32,000 for married couples) of “combined income" don't pay taxes on Social Security benefits. Combined income is equal to your adjusted gross income, plus nontaxable interest from instruments like municipal bond investments, plus half of your Social Security benefit.
This year, taxation of benefits is projected to raise about $94 billion, CRFB estimated.
Trump's change would make Social Security’s retirement trust fund insolvent more thanone year earlier – in early 2032 instead of late 2033 -- and the initial 21% cut across the board would deepen to a 25% cut, CRFB said.
“Vague political promises not to touch Social Security benefits are meaningless,” said Mary Johnson, a retired analyst for the nonprofit Senior Citizens League, last month. “Voters need to be shown where the money is coming from to pay our benefits."
Medora Lee is a money, markets, and personal finance reporter at USA TODAY. You can reach her at mjlee@usatoday.com and subscribe to our free Daily Money newsletter for personal finance tips and business news every Monday through Friday morning.
veryGood! (14455)
Related
- Meta donates $1 million to Trump’s inauguration fund
- Mike Tyson vs Jake Paul fight could be pro fight or exhibition: What's the difference?
- Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is expected to announce his VP pick for his independent White House bid
- Why did the NFL change the kickoff rule and how will it be implemented?
- At site of suspected mass killings, Syrians recall horrors, hope for answers
- Boston to pay $4.6M to settle wrongful death suit stemming from police killing of mentally ill man
- Fast wireless EV charging? It’s coming.
- North Carolina elections board finalizes results from primary marked by new voter ID rules
- Scoot flight from Singapore to Wuhan turns back after 'technical issue' detected
- Geoengineering Faces a Wave of Backlash Over Regulatory Gaps and Unknown Risks
Ranking
- South Korean president's party divided over defiant martial law speech
- WWII ace pilot Richard Bong's plane crashed in 1944. A team has launched a search for the wreckage in the South Pacific.
- Sleek Charging Stations that Are Stylish & Functional for All Your Devices
- Caitlin Clark effect: Iowa's NCAA Tournament win over West Virginia sets viewership record
- A White House order claims to end 'censorship.' What does that mean?
- Court tosses Republican Pennsylvania lawmakers’ challenge of state, federal voter access actions
- Ahmaud Arbery’s killers ask a US appeals court to overturn their hate crime convictions
- Time, money, lost business are part of hefty price tag to rebuild critical Baltimore bridge
Recommendation
Nearly half of US teens are online ‘constantly,’ Pew report finds
Lego moves to stop police from using toy's emojis to cover suspects faces on social media
Hunter Biden’s tax case heads to a California courtroom as his defense seeks to have it tossed out
Judge tosses out X lawsuit against hate-speech researchers, saying Elon Musk tried to punish critics
Warm inflation data keep S&P 500, Dow, Nasdaq under wraps before Fed meeting next week
Jhené Aiko announces 2024 tour: How to get tickets to Magic Hour Tour
Jake Paul, Mike Tyson take their fight to social media ahead of Netflix bout
Krystal Anderson’s Husband Shares Heart-Wrenching Message After Past Kansas City Chiefs Cheerleader Dies