Current:Home > NewsFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -FundWay
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
TradeEdge Exchange View
Date:2025-04-10 03:13:02
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (627)
Related
- Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
- CNN's town hall with Donald Trump takes on added stakes after verdict in Carroll case
- A New, Massive Plastics Plant in Southwest Pennsylvania Barely Registers Among Voters
- DEA moves to revoke major drug distributor's license over opioid crisis failures
- South Korean president's party divided over defiant martial law speech
- The Summer I Turned Pretty Cast Reveals Whether They're Team Conrad or Team Jeremiah
- Yes, Puerto Rican licenses are valid in the U.S., Hertz reminds its employees
- The 15 Best Sweat-Proof Beauty Products To Help You Beat the Heat This Summer
- What to watch: O Jolie night
- Cue the Fireworks, Kate Spade’s 4th of July Deals Are 75% Off
Ranking
- Friday the 13th luck? 13 past Mega Millions jackpot wins in December. See top 10 lottery prizes
- How businesses are using designated areas to help lactating mothers
- Companies are shedding office space — and it may be killing small businesses
- MTV News shut down as Paramount Global cuts 25% of its staff
- Who are the most valuable sports franchises? Forbes releases new list of top 50 teams
- Ice-T Defends Wife Coco Austin After She Posts NSFW Pool Photo
- You’ll Roar Over Katy Perry and Orlando Bloom’s PDA Moments at Wimbledon Match
- The Nation’s Youngest Voters Put Their Stamp on the Midterms, with Climate Change Top of Mind
Recommendation
Jamie Foxx reps say actor was hit in face by a glass at birthday dinner, needed stitches
American Airlines and JetBlue must end partnership in the northeast U.S., judge rules
The New York Times' Sulzberger warns reporters of 'blind spots and echo chambers'
A Pipeline Giant Pleads ‘No Contest’ to Environmental Crimes in Pennsylvania After Homeowners Complained of Tainted Water
Nearly half of US teens are online ‘constantly,’ Pew report finds
Intel named most faith-friendly company
Coach 4th of July Deals: These Handbags Are Red, White and Reduced 60% Off
One Candidate for Wisconsin’s Senate Race Wants to Put the State ‘In the Driver’s Seat’ of the Clean Energy Economy. The Other Calls Climate Science ‘Lunacy’